Water map shows billions at risk of 'water insecurity'

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    2 comments

By Richard Black: Environment correspondent, BBC News

About 80% of the world's population lives in areas where the fresh water supply is not secure, according to a new global analysis.

The study maps water availability and quality down to the regional level
The study maps water availability and quality down to the regional level

 

Researchers compiled a composite index of "water threats" that includes issues such as scarcity and pollution.

The most severe threat category encompasses 3.4 billion people.

Writing in the journal Nature, they say that in western countries, conserving water for people through reservoirs and dams works for people, but not nature.

They urge developing countries not to follow the same path.

“What we're able to outline is a planet-wide pattern of threat” Charles Vorosmarty City College of New York.

Instead, they say governments should invest in water management strategies that combine infrastructure with "natural" options such as safeguarding watersheds, wetlands and flood plains.

The analysis is a global snapshot, and the research team suggests more people are likely to encounter more severe stress on their water supply in the coming decades, as the climate changes and the human population continues to grow.

They have taken data on a variety of different threats, used models of threats where data is scarce, and used expert assessment to combine the various individual threats into a composite index.

The result is a map that plots the composite threat to human water security and to biodiversity in squares 50km by 50km (30 miles by 30 miles) across the world.

Changing pictures

"What we've done is to take a very dispassionate look at the facts on the ground - what is going on with respect to humanity's water security and what the infrastructure that's been thrown at this problem does to the natural world," said study leader Charles Vorosmarty from the City College of New York.

"What we're able to outline is a planet-wide pattern of threat, despite the trillions of dollars worth of engineering palliatives that have totally reconfigured the threat landscape."

Those "trillions of dollars" are represented by the dams, canals, aqueducts, and pipelines that have been used throughout the developed world to safeguard drinking water supplies.

Their impact on the global picture is striking: Natural
Their impact on the global picture is striking: Natural

Their impact on the global picture is striking: Managed
Their impact on the global picture is striking: Managed

Looking at the "raw threats" to people's water security - the "natural" picture - much of western Europe and North America appears to be under high stress.

However, when the impact of the infrastructure that distributes and conserves water is added in - the "managed" picture - most of the serious threat disappears from these regions.

Africa, however, moves in the opposite direction.

"The problem is, we know that a large proportion of the world's population cannot afford these investments," said Peter McIntyre from the University of Wisconsin, another of the researchers involved.

"In fact we show them benefiting less than a billion people, so we're already excluding a large majority of the world's population," he told BBC News.

"But even in rich parts of the world, it's not a sensible way to proceed. We could continue to build more dams and exploit deeper and deeper aquifers; but even if you can afford it, it's not a cost-effective way of doing things."

According to this analysis, and others, the way water has been managed in the west has left a significant legacy of issues for nature.

Whereas Western Europe and the US emerge from this analysis with good scores on water stress facing their citizens, wildlife there that depends on water is much less secure, it concludes.

Concrete realities

One concept advocated by development organisations nowadays is integrated water management, where the needs of all users are taken into account and where natural features are integrated with human engineering.

One widely-cited example concerns the watersheds that supply New York, in the Catskill Mountains and elsewhere around the city.

Water from these areas historically needed no filtering.

That threatened to change in the 1990s, due to agricultural pollution and other issues.

The city invested in a programme of land protection and conservation; this has maintained quality, and is calculated to have been cheaper than the alternative of building treatment works.

Mark Smith, head of the water programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) who was not involved in the current study, said this sort of approach was beginning to take hold in the developing world, though "the concrete and steel model remains the default".

"One example is the Barotse Floodplain in Zambia, where there was a proposal for draining the wetland and developing an irrigation scheme to replace the wetlands," he related.

"Some analysis was then done that showed the economic benefits of the irrigation scheme would have been less than the benefits currently delivered by the wetland in terms of fisheries, agriculture around the flood plain, water supply, water quality and so on.

"So it's not a question of saying 'No we don't need any concrete infrastructure' - what we need are portfolios of built infrastructure and natural environment that can address the needs of development, and the ecosystem needs of people and biodiversity."

Dollars short

This analysis is likely to come in for some scrutiny, not least because it does contain an element of subjectivity in terms of how the various threats to water security are weighted and combined.

Nevertheless, Mark Smith hailed it as a "potentially powerful synthesis" of existing knowledge; while Gary Jones, chief executive of the eWater Co-operative Research Centre in Canberra, commented: "It's a very important and timely global analysis of the joint threats of declining water security for humans and biodiversity loss for rivers.

"This study, for the first time, brings all our knowledge together under one global model of water security and aquatic biodiversity loss."

For the team itself, it is a first attempt - a "placeholder", or baseline - and they anticipate improvements as more accurate data emerges, not least from regions such as Africa that are traditionally data-scarce.

Already, they say, it provides a powerful indicator that governments and international institutions need to take water issues more seriously.

For developed countries and the Bric group - Brazil, Russia, India and China - alone, "$800bn per year will be required by 2015 to cover investments in water infrastructure, a target likely to go unmet," they conclude.

For poorer countries, the outlook is considerably more bleak, they say.

Developing countries are urged to think carefully about "concrete and steel" solutions
Developing countries are urged to think carefully about "concrete and steel" solutions

"In reality this is a snapshot of the world about five or 10 years ago, because that's the data that's coming on line now," said Dr McIntyre.

"It's not about the future, but we would argue people should be even more worried if you start to account for climate change and population growth.

"Climate change is going to affect the amount of water that comes in as precipitation; and if you overlay that on an already stressed population, we're rolling the dice."

Related stories:

Water - another global 'crisis'?

Mapping future water stress

Water policies suffer sinking feeling


By Richard Black: Environment correspondent, BBC News


Entangled whale freed off Doubtless Bay

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    3 comments

A large humpback whale which was tangled in rope off the Far North coast has been freed this afternoon.

Department of Conservation staff were able to cut free the debris on the tail of the 12-metre long, 30 tonne whale at 3.30pm, spokeswoman Carolyn Smith said.

The whale was first spotted entangled in rope and debris in Doubtless Bay on Monday.

Staff began a rescue attempt yesterday, and again this morning at 8.30am, managing to secure a hook on the rope.

Rescuers followed the whale until it tired itself out before they approached to cut it free.

Immediately after its release, the whale headed "steadily out to sea," Ms Smith said.

- NZPA


Search for rope-entangled whale last seen in Doubtless Bay

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    1 comment

By Paul Harper, NZ Herald
11:02 AM Tuesday Sep 28, 2010

Department of Conservation staff will attempt to remove ropes entangled around a humpback whale seen in Doubtless Bay - if they can find it. Any sightings should be reported to DOC on 09 408 6014.

The whale, with green rope around it. Photo / Department of Conservation
The whale, with green rope around it. Photo / Department of Conservation

The seven metre-long whale was seen with rope wrapped around it near Mangonui in the Far North about 11.30am yesterday.

DOC spokesperson Caroline Smith said this morning the whale was proving elusive and had still not been found

"A plane is up and a boat is out there looking," she said.

"It is somewhat like looking for a needle in a haystack, as we're only looking for the spout.

"If we don't find it chances are it will be found by the department further south as it is migrating.

Ms Smith said whales often became caught in ropes as they were curious animals. In the past decade 10 humpbacks had become tangled in ropes, eight of which were tangled in crayfishing ropes, she said.

Once the whale had been located, DOC rangers from Kaitaia and Kaikoura would head out by boat, with Ingrid Visser of the Tutukaka-based Orca Research Trust, in a bid to free it.

The technique used to remove the rope is called kegging. A boat will get as close as possible to the mammal and crew will attach a grapnel hook to its head. Attached to the hook would be 10m of rope connected to a ring. From the ring is another 50m of rope.

Kegging should tire the whale, which will allow crew to cut away the rope entangled around the whale as safely as possible.

Ms Smith said the technique was dangerous for staff and relatively new, having been used by DOC since only 2008.

DOC's Kaikoura field centre supervisor Mike Morrissey, who has used the kegging technique before, has flown up to assist.

The latest whale crisis comes only days after at least 70 pilot whales stranded on Spirits Bay in the Far North. After the survivors were driven an hour south to Rarawa Beach, 14 were saved.

By Paul Harper


National Marine and Freshwater Education Wananga, October 6-9

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    1 comment

The National Marine and Freshwater Education Wananga -

are now taking Registrations for their Conference 2010 to be held at Whakapaumahara Marae, Whananaki, Northland, Wednesday 6th – Saturday 9th October, 2010: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PROGRAMME AND REGISTRATION DETAILS or go to http://www.emr.org.nz/information.php?info_id=99&emrsid=93428ba9ebae48898eafc2de4166699c

The theme of the conference is "Collaboration for conservation of our marine and freshwater environments in schools and communities and it is billed as: "An inspirational professional development and networking opportunity for all those involved or interested in freshwater and marine conservation". 

The conference provides professional development, a forum to explore means we can collaborate in marine and freshwater conservation, and a forum for marine and freshwater educators to network about education for sustainability initiatives & projects (School and/or community based).

The conference will enhance delivery of Experiencing Marine Reserves (EMR) and Whitebait Connection (WBC) concepts around New Zealand.

The keynote address will be from Hone Taumaunu: Learn about a successful collaboration between Ngati Konohi and Department of Conservation to achieve marine conservation;What is the moana suite? and Tony Miguel: Learn about Project Twin Streams, an integrated community development approach.

Special deal for delegates from Northland – 10% rego discount for Northlanders until 30th September, bring your kids for just $70, register for just 1 day for $100

For more information contact: Samara Nicholas - Programme Director Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust - Experiencing Marine Reserves

Postal :539 Rockell Rd,

RD1 Hikurangi,

Whangarei

Home office: 09 433 8205

Mobile: 0210362019

Email: samara@emr.org.nz

Websites: www.emr.org.nz

www.marinenz.org.nz

www.whitebaitconnection.co.nz

Skype: experiencing.marine.reserves

Purchase top quality ‘Wettie’ snorkel gear and support EMR at the same time! Snorkel gear and products for sale on http://www.emr.org.nz/shop

This is a great opportunity to learn more about our freshwater and marine environments from some noted marine biologists and educators. Very useful for teachers, project leaders and interested members of the public. Click on the following documents for more information and for registration.

invite_to_community.pdf

invite_to_film_launch.pdf

marine_freshwater_wananga_2010_v4.pdf

national_wananga_10_registration_form.doc


Tawharanui made NZ's 34th marine reserve

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    1 comment

Auckland Regional Council has had a proposal to establish New Zealand's 34th marine reserve rubber stamped.

The 400ha Tawharanui Marine Reserve will be established off the Tawharanui Peninsula, east of Warkworth, and will replace and slightly enlarge the Tawharanui Marine Park which was established there in 1981.

Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson and Fisheries and Aquaculture Minister Phil Heatley said the area had a unique geology and was already a popular snorkelling spot having been a no-take fishing zone since 1981.

"The diversity of fish and other marine life, along with extensive reefs, also make it an ideal site for scientific research," Ms Wilkinson said.

- NZPA


NZ Kelp forests under threat

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    2 comments

This post originally appeared on Sciblogs.co.nz
By Dr Rebecca McLeod
11:55 AM Friday Sep 24, 2010

I am still reeling from an announcement made yesterday by the Minster of Fisheries and Aquaculture Phil Heatley regarding the setting of the total allowable "catch" for giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera). I thought I might try and calm down a little before I wrote this post, but the 20 or so emails that greeted me this morning from marine ecologists throughout the country made me realise that I am definitely not alone in feeling completely frustrated and disillusioned about the process of consultation and setting of catch limits for some of the species managed under the Quota Management System (QMS).

Just a little bit of background first. Last year the Ministry of Fisheries, following a period of consultation, entered giant kelp into the QMS (I blogged about this at the time: One step closer to harvesting kelp). It was a tough one for those concerned about the important ecological role that this species plays (perhaps most obviously in providing a home and food source for countless marine animals) - if the species wasn't entered into the QMS, expiration of a harvesting moratorium would mean that there were no controls on the amount of kelp that could be literally mowed from kelp forests around the South Island.

A second round of consultation followed earlier this year, where the Ministry produced three options for total allowable catch for the management area that extends from a point near Kaikoura all the way down to Slope Point at the southern most tip of the South Island. These options were 1) 375.8 tonnes, 2) 40 tonnes, and 3) 17 tonnes.

Given the paucity of scientific knowledge about the effects of removing the canopy of kelp forests on the species that rely on this habitat and food source, myself and a great number of marine scientists argued that a cautious approach should be taken and thus the catch limits set very low - at least until our scientific understanding improves. If you are interested in the current state of knowledge and concerns that many scientists have, I wrote an extensive post on this last year - Is it wise to mow our kelp forests?

Anyway, moving right along, I was more than a little, shall we say, surprised to read the Minister's announcement yesterday that the total allowable catch for the east coast of the South Island had been set at... wait for it... 1,238 tonnes! But hang on a minute, wasn't the largest option put forward by his own advisors 375.8 tonnes? Well, yes. But what would they know?

Now I obviously don't have a good understanding of how this process works. What is the point of asking for submissions about a range of catch options if you are only going to dream up a completely new figure? How can this be legal?

But rest easy my friends, the Ministry of Fisheries Chief Executive Wayne McNee said: "The Minister was very mindful of the important role bladder kelp plays in the ecosystem and has imposed conservative controls on harvest to make sure this role is not compromised." Oh PHEW! Here I was thinking that it must all be about money.

It takes a lot of time and research to write a submission that is based on current scientific knowledge. I personally feel like the effort that my colleagues and I put into this process was a complete and utter waste of time. If anyone can enlighten me as to how this 'game' works, I would really appreciate it.

But perhaps more importantly, we need to start seriously thinking about ways to protect our local kelp forests - it is not only scientists that should be worried about the imminent threat that they now face.

Recreational and commercial fishers, divers, coastal dwellers: this is very much your problem too.

Grrr grrr grrrr, over and out.

Dr Rebecca McLeod is a marine ecologist at the University of Otago. View her work and that of 35 other scientists and science writers at Sciblogs, New Zealand's largest science blogging network.


Whale Rescue, Spirits Bay update

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    6 comments

From DOC MEDIA RELEASE

23 September 2010

Rescue efforts are focused on the logistical challenges of saving the 24 whales still alive at Spirits Bay in the far north.

A team of about 160 rescuers is working to consolidate 3 groups of whales into one and move it to the stream at the southern end of Spirits Bay. This will make it easier to keep the whales wet and comfortable and be more efficient for the rescue team.

The spread of whales across a large beach area has added to the complexities of stranding management.  The aim now is to focus on what we can do for the surviving whales.  They will be kept in the stream overnight and move them 50k by truck to Rarawa beach for re-floatation tomorrow (Friday).

If today’s strong winds and high seas drop, conditions may be suitable to try a re-float at Spirits Bay tomorrow.

Volunteers are still needed for the ongoing rescue effort.  Bring a thick wetsuit, wind-break clothing and be prepared to stay overnight in your own vehicle or tent. 

Volunteers should report direct to the Spirits Bay campground.

Gill Minogue
Far North Whale Rescue


Political challenge over water - A Fresh Start for Fresh Water

Posted 14 years, 3 months ago    1 comment

NZ Herald: By Brian Fallow - Thursday Sep 23, 2010

With any luck and with some political leadership, the release of the Land and Water Forum's report, A Fresh Start for Fresh Water, will prove something of a watershed event.

It may come to be seen as the point when we stopped thinking of water, if at all, in terms of boundless bounty and began to confront the challenges of increasing scarcity and pollution.

The forum, chaired by Alastair Bisley, encompassed a wide range of stakeholders and has been an exercise in Nordic-style "collaborative governance".

They call for limits to be set on what can be put into waterways, and how much can be taken from them, but they do not attempt to prescribe them.

Nor do they quarrel with regional councils continuing to be the key decision-making bodies, catchment by catchment.

But they say regional governance must be strengthened if the devolved model is to be kept, and propose adding Government appointees to councils to provide skills they might lack and adequate representation of iwi on water-related committees.

They say the councils need to be given a lot better guidance from central government on what to do and how to do it.

National decisions need to be taken, and the sooner the better, about strategic objectives and about environmental standards.

"Many catchments are over-allocated or approaching full allocation," the report says.

"Water scarcity is an increasing problem in some areas and may be worsened by changing weather patterns, but our current system of allocating water does not encourage efficient use or easily allow transfer to best use."

The days of first come, first served - predicated on plenty for everyone - are numbered.

The forum proposes, as a matter of urgency, setting some "threshold of pending scarcity" which would require adoption of a more sophisticated system for allocating water in a catchment.

It gives the Government three broad options to consider. One is to continue existing consents but impose tougher conditions as they expire.

This is not necessarily a soft option. Even now electricity generators complain that renewing consents for existing hydro schemes is a more arduous and lengthy process than getting consents for a new gas-fired power station.

The second broad option would be to establish a new system of allocation set out in a regional plan.

Devising such a plan would require balancing efficiency considerations, community preferences and providing a degree of preference to existing consent holders at risk of finding themselves with stranded assets.

The third option is user pays.

An auction or tender system for water permits, coupled with trading, would harness the power of prices and markets in allocating scarce resources and enable water to flow, so to speak, to those who can make best use of it.

Remember that we are talking here about the proportion of the resource which is available for commercial use and has not been reserved for the maintenance of ecological and recreational values.

The forum is not recommending the use of pricing, or either of the other options for that matter. But it believes the option should be on the table.

On the issue of pollution and water quality the forum eschews a one-size-fits-all approach.

It seems keen on industry-wide codes of best practice, reinforced if possible by incentives, and penalties for recalcitrant free-riders.

In the case of the dairy industry, that might involve the extension of riparian planting to filter runoff, with the councils providing native plants at cost and fencing where possible to keep cattle away from waterways.

It notes Fonterra's recently introduced "Every Farm, Every Year" scheme to independently appraise its suppliers' effluent infrastructure and implement effluent improvement plans for those who need them.

Sanctions for failing to comply with such a plan would include not picking up the supplier's milk.

Another Fonterra initiative - still under development - would provide merit payments to encourage adoption of the expected management practices not only on effluent but the efficient use of nutrients and irrigation water.

These are a welcome advance from the days when acrid fumes of injured innocence and denial used to waft off the industry whenever people complained about dirty dairying or worried about the threat it posed to the national clean, green brand.

The forum's report sees a place for cap-and-trade mechanisms, such as the Lake Taupo nitrogen market, and other forms of polluter-pays.

But it acknowledges that for some water bodies, improving water quality to an acceptable standard is likely to be an inter-generational task requiring both a strategic plan and funding.

The report puts a lot of weight on collaboration among the diverse groups with an interest in waterways.

This is starkly at odds with fractious and adversarial relationships of the past.

The forum itself is an exercise in this approach.

It has required 58 different stakeholders, including iwi, farmers, environmentalists, hydro generators, tourism interests and so on, to talk to each other, instead of the traditional hub-and-spoke approach where everybody separately lobbies the Government or the regional council and then complains bitterly that they have given too much heed to competing interests.

Whether this can be replicated at a regional level, when very specific interests and not lofty generalities are involved, remains to be seen, however.

In the end regulatory bodies will have to call an end to discussion and debate, and make decisions.

Water is not just an issue for rural New Zealand, of course.

Some $11 billion of capital expenditure will be needed over the next eight years on water supply, waste water, storm water and flood protection facilities in cities and smaller communities.

Yet responsibility for all this is split among 67 local and 12 regional bodies.

The report suggests rationalising them into a small number of publicly-owned utilities, with a national regulator replacing council oversight of pricing and service provision.

It also says metering and charging for water would yield efficiency and environmental gains. It accepts other stakeholders have an interest in these beyond the Land and Water Forum.

By Brian Fallow | Email Brian



Shim